-
@MarinaTheNerd @Locke_Wiggins @cheaptoyJP @snezewort @professordarwin @jrleon80 I think typically harming to kill isn’t the intent when stopping people from damaging your property unless it’s specifically valuable to you, it’s just attacking can always result in a kill. I don’t think it matters whether or not the kill was intended though.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -15 🙁
-
@MarinaTheNerd @Locke_Wiggins @cheaptoyJP @snezewort @professordarwin @jrleon80 The person intending to do harm is forfeiting their right to not be harmed, and losing that right always means you could lose your life. I think if you can avoid killing it’s good, but if your attack kills them it’s also fine. I don’t really view the riots as analogous herePermalink On twitter.com
-
@MarinaTheNerd @Locke_Wiggins @cheaptoyJP @snezewort @professordarwin @jrleon80 Riots are violence in response to systemic racial injustice and violence, some of these property owners are completely innocent from this and they have a right to defend it, but the rioters and protesters have an equally valid reason. Only actual problem here is the copsOn twitter.com